Academy course
Academic writing that survives peer review
Structure an IMRaD manuscript, argue from evidence, and answer a major-revision decision without panic.
What this is
A writing course built around reviewer psychology. You draft, get structured critique, and revise — learning the moves that make a methods section verifiable and a discussion defensible.
What you will be able to do
- • Draft an IMRaD manuscript with a results section that matches your statistics
- • Write claims that your data can actually support
- • Edit for clarity, hedging and tone at reviewer level
- • Write a point-by-point rebuttal that changes a decision
Workspace services used
Every module is practised inside services you already have in your account.
Start in workspace — AI WriterSyllabus
1. The reader you are writing for
Editor screening, reviewer heuristics, and the first 200 words.
2. Methods & results
Reproducible methods, figure/table logic, reporting statistics correctly.
3. Introduction & discussion
Gap framing, limitations that build trust, implications without overreach.
4. Revision & rebuttal
Decoding decision letters, prioritising comments, writing the response document.
Join the next intake
Cohorts open on a rolling basis and places are limited so feedback stays personal. Create an account to reserve a place, or write to us with your topic and timeline.