SciExpert

Systematic Review

Rigorous, auditable systematic reviews with PRISMA reporting

The evidence for each criterion is prepared before your reviewers open a paper, so a screening decision is a few cited sentences — not a thirty-page re-read.

Start a reviewContact us
PRISMA 2020 flow

Identification

Records identified

Duplicates removed

Screening

Titles and abstracts screened

Excluded with reasons

Included

Full texts assessed

Studies included

Each box is filled with the counts from your own review as you screen.

Built for reviews that get audited

Criteria applied consistently

Your inclusion and exclusion criteria are applied to every record, and each decision is stored with its reason.

Evidence for every criterion

Relevant statements are pulled from the record and shown next to the criterion they answer.

AI-assisted screening

AI prepares the evidence and a suggested read; the include or exclude call is always yours.

Extraction you can check

Extracted values sit next to the source record so you can verify them before you use them.

The full workflow, on record

01ProtocolDefine the question and the inclusion and exclusion criteria before a single record is screened.
02SearchRun the search against the live scholarly index and keep the terms and counts with the review.
03DeduplicateDuplicate records are detected and removed before screening, and the removals are counted.
04Title & abstract screeningCited evidence is prepared per criterion; you include or exclude, and the reason is recorded.
05Full-text assessmentAssess the records that pass, with exclusion reasons recorded exactly as PRISMA expects.
06ExtractionFill your own extraction columns across the included studies and export the table.
07PRISMA flowThe diagram is generated from the counts your review actually produced.

Compliance-grade output, without the spreadsheet archaeology

  • Inclusion and exclusion criteria recorded with the protocol
  • Exclusion reason stored against every excluded record
  • PRISMA 2020 flow built from your own screening counts
  • Cited evidence shown next to each criterion during screening
  • Search terms and result counts kept with the review
  • CSV export of screening decisions and extracted data