Solutions
The same rigor, shaped to how you work
Whether the reader is a thesis committee, a journal editor or a regulator, the requirement is the same: show where the evidence came from.
Academic researchers
Map a field before you commit to it, keep the papers that matter in one library, and produce reviews you can defend.
- · Citation Explorer for field mapping
- · Cited synthesis in AI Search
- · Research Gap Finder for the open questions
PhD students
Turn a scattered reading list into a structured chapter, with extraction tables that feed your methods and results.
- · Reference library with collections
- · Chat with PDF for dense methods sections
- · Custom extraction columns
Authors preparing a submission
Get a referee-style report, screen your figures and shortlist a target venue before you submit.
- · AI Peer Review at three depths
- · Figure Integrity forensics
- · Journal Finder from title and abstract
Evidence synthesis work
Screen against explicit criteria, record every exclusion reason, and generate the PRISMA flow from your own counts.
- · Criteria-based screening
- · Exclusion reasons on record
- · PRISMA flow and CSV export
Reviewers and experts
Publish your credentials, set your own rate per page or per paper, and review manuscripts through the platform.
- · Verified academic profile
- · Your own pricing and turnaround
- · Optional anonymity with an alias
Anyone who needs a human read
Hire a verified reviewer directly, upload your manuscript privately and receive a written report inside the order.
- · Price shown before you commit
- · Private manuscripts with version history
- · Messaging with your reviewer
Not sure where you fit?
Tell us about the review you are planning and we will point you at the right workflow.